Coronial
VICaged care

Finding into death of Stephen Ross Wakefield

Deceased

Stephen Ross Wakefield

Demographics

66y, male

Coroner

Coroner Michelle Hodgson

Date of death

2017-06-20

Finding date

2018-08-21

Cause of death

Complications of metastatic colorectal cancer (palliated)

AI-generated summary

Stephen Ross Wakefield, a 66-year-old man with Fragile X Syndrome and intellectual disability, died from complications of metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative care. He was diagnosed with bowel cancer in 2015, which metastasised to his liver by late 2016. After deciding against chemotherapy due to poor prognosis and quality-of-life considerations, he received palliative care at his residential facility. His condition declined from April 2017 with reduced eating, increased sleep, weight loss, and declining mobility. He died peacefully at his residential care facility surrounded by carers. This case demonstrates appropriate end-of-life decision-making in a patient with intellectual disability, with carers and healthcare providers making compassionate choices aligned with the patient's best interests and quality of life.

AI-generated summary — refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

palliative careoncologygeneral practice

Contributing factors

  • metastatic disease to liver
  • decline in functional status from April 2017
  • patient elected palliative care approach
Full text

IN THE CORONERS COURT

OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE Court Reference: COR 2017 2909

FINDING INTO DEATH WITHOUT INQUEST Form 38 Rule 60(2) Section 67 of the Coroners Act 2008

Findings of: MICHELLE HODGSON, CORONER

Deceased: STEPHEN ROSS WAKEFIELD

Date of birth: 30 April 1951

Date of death: 20 June 2017

Cause of death: i(a) COMPLICATIONS OF METASTATIC

COLORECTAL CANCER (PALLIATED)

Place of death: 8 Roycroft Avenue, Mill Park, Victoria

HER HONOUR:

Background

Stephen Ross Wakefield was born on 30 April 1951. He was 66 years old when he died on

20 June 2017 from complications of cancer.

Mr Wakefield was born with Fragile X Syndrome with associated intellectual disability. He lived in several disability care facilities from a young age before eventually moving to the

residential care facility in Mill Park! in 1989.

In 2015, Mr Wakefield was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy and bowel cancer, after which his health began to deteriorate. When the bowel tumour was removed, he suffered complications, which required a three-week admission in an intensive care unit. After the surgery, Mr Wakefield began to suffer from recurrent bowel obstructions, which led to multiple hospital admissions. It was not always possible for Mr Wakefield to undergo a scan due to his stress and anxiety (about medical procedures and hospitals), and the need to

sedate him.

In 2016, Mr Wakefield was also found to have an enlarged prostate, which required a

TURP? procedure to reduce the inflammation.

The coronial investigation

Mr Wakefield’s death was reported to the Coroner as it fell within the definition of a reportable death in the Coroners Act 2008 (the Act). His death was reportable because he was in the care of the State immediately before the time of his death.? Deaths of persons in the care of the State are reportable to ensure independent scrutiny of the circumstances surrounding their deaths. If such deaths occur as a result of natural causes, a coronial

investigation must take place but the holding of an inquest is not mandatory.

Coroners independently investigate reportable deaths to find, if possible, identity, medical cause of death and with some exceptions, surrounding circumstances. Surrounding

circumstances are limited to events which are sufficiently proximate and causally related to

1 A Department of Health and Human Services xun five-bed residential facility.

2 Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a surgery used to treat urinary problems due to an enlarged prostate.

3 Sce section 4(2)(c) of the Coroners Act 2008 (Vic).

Ll.

the death. Coroners make findings on the balance of probabilities, not proof beyond

reasonable doubt.*

The law is clear that coroners establish facts; they do not cast blame, or determine criminal or civil liability.

Under the Act, coroners also have the important functions of helping to prevent deaths and promoting public health and safety and the administration of justice through the making of comments or recommendations in appropriate cases about any matter connected to the death

under investigation.

Victoria Police assigned an officer to be the Coroner’s Investigator for the investigation into Mr Wakefield’s death. The Coroner’s Investigator conducted inquiries on my behalf,

including taking statements from witnesses, and submitted a coronial brief of evidence.

After considering all the material obtained during the coronial investigation, I determined that Thad sufficient information to complete my task as coroner and that further investigation was

not required.

Whilst I have reviewed all the material, I will only refer to that which is directly relevant to

my findings or necessary for narrative clarity.

Identity of the deceased

Mr Wakefield was visually identified by his cousin, Vivienne Drew, on 20 June 2017.

Identity was not in issue and required no further investigation.

Medical cause of death

On 21 June 2017, Dr Victoria Francis, Forensic Pathologist at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, conducted an external examination of the body of Mr Wakefield and reviewed a post mortem computed tomography (CT) scan. The CT scan showed a markedly

enlarged liver.

  • In the coronial jurisdiction facts must be established on the balance of probabilities subject to the principles enunciated in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR. 336. The effect of this and similar authoritics is that coroners should not make adverse findings against, or comments about, individuals unless the evidence provides a comfortable level of satisfaction as to those matters taking into account the consequences of such findings or comments.

Dr Francis completed a report, dated 22 June 2017, in which she formulated the cause of death as “/{a) Complications of metastatic colorectal cancer (palliated)”. Dr Francis was also of the opinion that the death was due to natural causes. | accept Dr Francis’s opinion as to

the medical cause of death.

Circumstances in which the death occurred

In late 2016, a CT scan revealed that the bowel cancer had metastasised to Mr Wakefield’s liver. Mr Wakefield’s carers decided not to proceed with chemotherapy as it would not significantly prolong his life but rather negatively impact his quality of life. He was provided

with palliative care at his residential care facility.

According to his carer, Jade Spence, at the time of his diagnosis, he was his “normal self” and continued to be happy. His condition began to decline in about April 2017, at which time his eating habits changed and he began to sleep more. He subsequently began to lose weight,

required more pain medication, and his mobility declined.

Mr Wakefield passed away at 10.00 on 20 June 2017, surrounded by his carers.

Mr Wakefield’s carers remember him as a wonderful, happy, and jovial gentleman, who was

full of compliments and full of life. The residential unit is not the same without him.

Findings

Pursuant to section 67(1) of the Coroners Act 2008 I find as follows:

(a) the identity of the deceased was Stephen Ross Wakefield, born 30 April 1951;

(b) Mr Wakefield died on 20 June 2017 at 8 Roycroft Avenue, Mill Park, Victoria, from

complications of metastatic colorectal cancer (palliated); and

(c) the death occurred in the circumstances described above.

I convey my sincere condolences-to Mr Wakefield’s family.

I direct that a copy of this finding be provided to the following:

Vivienne Drew, Senior Next of Kin

Senior Constable Kasey Owen, Coroner’s Investigator, Victoria Police

Pursuant to section 73(1B) of the Act, I order that this finding be published on the internet in

accordance with the rules.

Signature:

Vi MICHELLE HODGSON f- Ne

CORONER Date: 21 August 2018.

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries are for educational purposes only and must not be treated as legal documents. Report an inaccuracy.